redemption – Breathing Room

Loyalties Divided

Truthfulness, compassion, and forbearance are the trademark calling of the philosophy of Falun Gong, also know as Falun Dafa. Yet, the repressive CCP (Chinese Communist Party) regime seeks to suppress this revived version of the traditional religious and philosophical underpinnings of Chinese society. It is an affront to their intolerance of anything that runs counter to their methods of control, that are based on fear, distrust, and hatred.

During the Maoist revolution of the 1960’s Mao’s cultural revolution waged war against what was referred to as the Four Olds: Old Ideas, Old Culture, Old Customs, Old Habits. Unfortunately, 5,000 years of Chinese ethical belief and culture was destroyed virtually overnight. In place of their cultural relics, Mao’s image in photographs, painting, and statues appeared everywhere. He became a demigod, as a result of crushing all other means to seek deity.

The vision of Karl Marx that fueled the fires of both Chinese and Russian Communism is ultimately one that can be characterized as entropic, that is to say, leading toward entropy. Yet, it is not a passive dissolution of the status quo; rather, a revolutionary enactment of overthrowing everything that previously existed, in order to start anew, transferring power, in an abrupt manner to the state.

Incidentally, the reason that the Marxist cultural revolution transforming this country is not ostensibly recognized as such is because of its implementation that focused on societal change by undermining society by gaining access within its institutions. Additionally, Rod Dreher delineates between hard totalitarianism, such as in the former Soviet Union with its system of Gulags, and soft-totalitarianism, that can be construed as a form of digital Marxism wherein people are canceled, lose benefits, reputations, and jobs. China currently has such a system, via the social credit scoring technology to control its citizens, in additions to its still extant version of hard totalitarianism.

On a moral level, the philosophy of Marxism via the Woke movement will be devastating to society, running counter to its claims of promoting social justice. One key point may be mentioned, in light of cancel culture, as follows: Judeo-Christian belief promotes forgiveness, as do other major world religions; yet, Marxism teaches unforgiveness. It does not permit a place for forgiveness; rather, it views its targets as “irredeemable.”

Within the overall framework of this cultural revolution in America, how can we relegate the issues to politics, and exclude the value of our faith in entering the discussion? This revolution of culture is changing the morals of society; therefore, it is less of a political framework than an underlying grounds for change in the moral sphere of society.

To not enter into an awareness of what is happening, nor give voice to our values, is to cede to the Marxist element of this cultural revolution. If religion is supposed to inform every area of our lives, than “politics” cannot be separated from our belief and practice. Our political views need to be informed by our religion, ethics, and values, not the other way around.

Forgetting our humanity, we are being led down a road of destruction that will divide the country into categories, similar to those established within the Maoist Revolution. Consider how the basic premise of the Woke Movement divides the populace into two basic categories of the oppressed and the oppressor. This is revolutionary language, meant to undermine the establishment, values, and foundations of this country. It is traceable back to the 1960’s and earlier in history, as will be further explained in this essay.

Freedom entails responsibility, direction, and motivation toward a value, that has import on both the lives of individuals and a society as whole. First of all, inner freedom, wherein we have the capacity to transcend our temperament, especially if inclined toward criticism, and judgmental attitudes. If we do not control our temperaments, then our temperaments will control us, leading toward agitation, and social unrest. If we give reign to our inner angst, then “cancel culture,” in all of its despotism, will continue to wreak havoc, because it “feels” like the natural way to vent our anger.

The intolerant stance toward members of society who are called out for their past and present sins is in direct philosophical opposition to the tenets of Judeo-Christian belief and other religions that place value in the ability, no, the necessity to forgive those who have wronged us, slighted our ego, or trampled upon our feelings. In the case of a proper attitude promoted by Judeo-Christian belief toward those who think differently than us, we are to enter into civil discourse with those who hold other opinions. And even if we agree to disagree, to still hold no grudge, resentment or hatred toward them.

The ideologues fueling the fire of the woke movement are directly opposed to compendium of morality, promoted by religious values. A parallel can be made to the members of Falun Gong who are persecuted in China, so too, anyone who exhibits traditional, moral and religious values is being silenced, censured, and cancelled.

Yet, there is one important difference to note within the framework of this comparison. For the CCP, it is only following up on what the Maoist revolution began in the 1960’s. Yet, In America, we are only at the beginning of a Marxist revolution that has come to fruition after the long march toward socialism through the institutions that began in the 1960’s with the New Left.

Intellectuals from the Frankfort School, established in Germany in 1929, who sought to continue their neo-Marxist agenda, escaped the Nazi regime in Germany by relocating in America at Columbia University, under the protective cloud of the New School of Social Research. Eventually, the teaching that they brought with them influenced a generation already ripe with revolutionary foment. Marxist intellectuals like Herbert Marcusse, Saul Alinsky, and Antonio Gramsci galvanized the 1960’s New Left. Antonio Gramsci, in particular, advocated infiltrating the institutions to transform society from within its various structures.

The legacy of the 1960’s as a whole can be encapsulated in the performance of the Jimmie Hendrix version of the Star-Spangled Banner. The same disdain for America, authority, and religion is being furthered in the educational system, as is symbolized in the discordant, loud, and raucous notes of his electric guitar.

Where is the moral compass of this country? At this point, since the decline of the nation, it’s trajectory toward a valueless morass, sponsored by a socialist upheaval will in all likelihood continue, the question needs to be reframed for the individual. I think that is still sincerely more important to seek the renewal of souls, who may be lost in the confusion of a country that is torn asunder by many elements, competing for the attention, loyalty, and devotion of the populace. When G-d has been left out of the equation, cancelled from the public exchange of ideas, and left out of the overall culture of a country, then people will seek some other “god” to fill that void, that we all have inside of us.

….

Existential Isolation: Transforming the Soul

Exploring the Ground of Being and G-d Awareness

A sense of groundlessness can lead to either despair, or the existential discovery of G-d. Unless addressed in the ensuing days, weeks and months, despair will always appear as a factor to be rendered with, by alleviating the isolation with a continuous search for the author of our being.

Existential psychology, in and of itself, does not recognize divine authorship of the human being; and, therefore it fails in two concerns. Not to recognize G-d as a source of hope, strength and comfort; and, secondly, neglecting the soul’s divine blueprint, with a G-d given purpose in life stamped on the essence of each individual.

This leaves a person grappling with self-identity, self-expression, and freedom without the inherent obligations commended by G-d’s word. Thus, the freedom without responsibilities acknowledged from a transcendent source, can potentially render the soul groundless, time and time again, until that sense of groundlessness is sublimated by the psyche, and filled up with the distractions in life that keep our minds distant from a higher purpose.

What is the answer? Existential psychology would both applause and critique this freedom as the opportunity to be our own authors in life; yet, while potentially becoming overwhelmed with the possibilities, especially without a sense of moral ground. (The truth is that we are not free, because of our sin nature; however, I will leave that to another time for further exploration.).

Society is being drawn toward the illusion of freedom today, with the resultant option that arises by default, namely, a pervasive nihilism whether implicit or explicit in the lives of people, who are inclined to gravitate more toward materialism than a sense of inner purpose and transcendent values.

Perhaps, it is simply when the groundlessness of our lives becomes apparent at a time of some existential crisis, that we are brought face to face with either G-d or ourselves. And, I would presume to think that it is only human nature to vacillate between the two. I am speaking of my own experience, as well as an intuition intermingled with various sources that address this fundamental truth of our existence; for instance, theology, philosophy, psychology and specific scriptural passages from the Bible.

For myself, this relatively new awareness of the groundlessness of my life has become a kind of fertile void, wherein I am able to explore more freely than in the past. Furthermore, I have gone into the depths of my own heart, and the heights of connecting to G-d through prayer, while also plummeting the wisdom of kitvei kodesh (holy scripture).

For the most part, there is a distinct blend of subjectivity with objectivity in what I am writing, as an exposition on my initial thoughts, based upon the beginning of my exploration of this condition, that needs to be named, defined, and brought out in relief by the findings of others who preceded me in their exploration, and surpass me in wisdom.

Thus, I make no pretense of knowing anything, except the experience of being that has not left me since its initial inception in my own life, when I was brought to a place of existential isolation on my last night of quarantine, after contracting Omicron, in November of 2022. It would certainly be interesting to know, if anyone else has had a similar experience, and found it to be life-changing event. (please, feel free to comment if you have).

Shalom aleichem (Peace unto you).

Existential Realities – page 1

“G-d speaks in different ways, and we don’t always recognize his voice. Sometimes in the night, he uses terrifying dreams, to give us warning. G-d does this to make us turn from sin and pride and protect us from being swept away to the world of the dead.” – Job 33:14-18, CEV

One seemingly unbearable consequence of isolation is its potential to reveal hidden truths about oneself. Thus, on the eve of my tenth day of quarantine for Covid, last November, I entered a state of “existential dread.” I was faced with all of the unpleasant things about myself that would surface on occasion in my life, and then submerge below my conscious awareness again.

There was no respite, until a divine intervention brought about relief around 3:00 a.m. that morning. Yet, the issue at a hand was not the stark realities that each of those unresolved issues portended; rather, what those concerns pointed toward, namely, a feeling of meaningless in my life, despite my faith, that almost always serves as a buttress between a positive outlook and encroaching negativity.

It was as if a sense of meaningless permeated my entire being, while consolation in my religious belief and practice seemed to be in limbo at that time. Within the framework of existential psychology, “meaninglessness” is one of the four universal issues that people face in their lives to a greater or lesser degree. Yet, as I mentioned, meaninglessness is usually buffered by my faith.

I believe that meaning and purpose in life is derived from the Biblical creation narrative, regarding the dual role of mankind in regard to Gan Eden, “to work it and guard it.” Upon a closer reading of the original Hebrew, the injunction may be rendered as “to serve and to observe;” in other words, to serve G-d, and observe His commandments.

To this day, I still accept this injunction as axiomatic to my faith, as well as a universal given, noting the authority of the Bible. This has always been enough for me, ever since I became observant, within the context of my belief and practice: yet, an individual purpose in life, one that is uniquely my own, must be drawn out from this dual raison d’etre. Perhaps, the sum total of everyday tasks that constitute its fulfillment is not enough to substantiate that reason. There must be a more in-depth inculcation of this reason for being.

The issue hand, revealed to me by the emptiness of that night was the following: gnawing questions of my life in comparison to others, whose lives are successful by modern or worldly standards, stood out in stark relief, against my own, even though I had always dismissed the comparisons. Yet, this time I could not deny how I felt – bereft of a trajectory.

Even so, my sense of relief arrived before dawn, when I was shown that correspondence with others about these issues would somehow bring me renewal. At that point, a wave of peace swept over me. Now, it is up to me to set aside the rumination of these concerns, and simply follow the prescriptive remedy given to me from a divine source.