
Active Listening and Mutual Acceptance:
I think that some people are clearly looking for solutions to the world’s problems, and may feel that if the view that they have accepted as the solution is not accepted by others, then the fruition of that solution into actuality is being threatened. It’s as if the enactment of their world view, that they have staked a claim upon as necessary for a better society, is a view desperately clung to as a panacea for the world. It is not so much their own certitude in regard to their particular view, rather their allegiance toward that worldview as the only credible solution for the evils of the world. As such, it may become implausible for them to even attempt to consider how anyone else could object; and, therefore their only recourse is to shut down the other, or for themselves to exit the conversation, while condemning the other. Apparently, civil discourse is not an option when emotions run high, and devotion to a cause is intractable.
As a result of this political, social, and moral climate, another question is being asked, based on the assumption that people in general need to stand together in some kind of unity with each other, or at the very least, acceptance of each other’s viewpoints. After all, isn’t that what the term, diversity originally meant? Yet, amongst the left, and those who support the Woke Ideology there can be no room for error in their presuppositions about the world as seen through the Marxist lens of power dynamics. So, how can the ordinary person better learn to communicate with one’s fellow person? How can we allow for the diversity of opinion celebrated in an actual democracy? Moreover, what has happened to the marketplace of ideas in this country?
Consider that there must be a mutual receptivity to what the other has to say, and those words need to be spoken in a nonassertive way, without putting oneself or one’s ideas upon a pedestal. Additionally, both must be active listeners as well as effective communicators, giving ample time and space to the other to express his or her viewpoints before responding. Additionally, if individuals stand upon their own belief system, in recognition that first and foremost they must be the ones to enact it in their own personal lives, then maybe there would be less of an impetus for others to also have to accept the same worldview. Finally, to act out of humility, knowing that one’s viewpoints might not necessarily lead toward the ideal sense of society that one would hope to see; and, be open to exploring other possibilities.
Yet, the main reason why the marketplace of ideas has been shut down is because of the rise of cancel culture in mainstream society. This “strategy,” if you will, for getting one’s way in a heated debate began over ten years ago on university campuses. It was used so much as a tool of the left, that even in universities at that time, many students as well as teachers with conservative viewpoints withheld their views in order to escape being dragged out into the limelight of public discourse where they could be intimidated. Perhaps, today, the intransigence of one’s position as the only defense against others with different views only contributes to the invective.
So, it may not be about changing others per se; rather, simply to start by challenging the stance of others who feel a need to be overly assertive about their viewpoints, asking why they feel threatened by those with different views. And, if some is open to sincere dialogue, then to raise that possibility as a means of restoring a sense of civil discourse. Yet, as for the ideologues who are not interested in entertaining any other set of ideas, how can someone unwilling to discourse with another be approached? The strength of one’s position compels that person to see his or view as the correct one, and to be adamant to the point of refusal to hear anyone else’s view. This intransigence is a roadblock that cannot be crossed, except if that person realizes through personal insight, the nature of his position, and the need to transform one’s viewpoints. (Stay tuned for Part 2).





